We all, women especially, deserve to know what Women’s March is about (it’s not about marching for women)

July 29, 2022

This post is being sent to paid subscribers only. As always, thank you for your generous support, which makes it possible for me to continue in the fight to protect the sex-based rights of women and girls and to stop the abolition of sex at the altar of “gender identity.”

---

Last week, I wrote a (free and shareable) post about how Women’s March had finally, completely, lost the plot not only by tweeting “trans women are women,” which it has been doing for years, but by publicly declaring war on “TERFs” (“trans exclusionary radical feminists,” or, more accurately, radical feminist leftists who recognize the material reality of sex). 

The next day, Women’s March updated its logo to feature a very male-looking silhouette, overlaid on top of two very female-looking silhouettes. 

Women’s March has not been quiet about how it feels about “TERFs.” It has continued its war on women over the course of the past week.

It also had this to say:

To which I responded:

What I didn’t realize when I wrote the initial Substack piece (because I only joined Twitter in 2021) is that Women’s March has been hating women on Twitter at least since 2019. No matter, TERFs aren’t quitting any time soon. With J.K. Rowling, Bette Midler, and Macy Gray on our side, how can we lose?

I decided to do a little digging to find out more about what Women’s March is up to these days. This post is about what I learned.