We are writing to express our family's deep concern over the SF Human Rights Commission investigation into San Francisco spas offering single-sex spaces.
We are lifelong Democratic political activists and women's rights advocates. Every Democrat and liberal should be vehemently protesting the elimination of women's female-only spaces.
What is this SF HRC investigation in aid of?
Men who choose not to use men's male-only spaces?
Men with an overriding desire to appear naked among unconsenting naked little girls and women?
Men like Dwight Austin--a convicted rapist with an “above average risk” of reoffending--who demanded naked access to the female-only spaces at Archimedes Banya?
Is this what the SF Human Rights Commission stands for: forcing little girls and women to accept rapists in our female-only safe spaces?
Is this what our foremothers fought for: the complete and total loss of girls' and women's rights, over which those heroic women made such appalling sacrifices?
Is San Francisco now a city that stands on the side of violent male supremacy?
It has been many years since left-wing San Francisco teenagers learned of the dangers of transgenderism and rejected it as the assault on their human rights and bodies that it is.
When will San Francisco adults catch up with them?
Please stand with girls and women in protecting our rights to safety, privacy, and dignity in our own world.
Great letter that could be useful in any situation where people in power are imposing misogynistic practices on girls and women! Thanks for posting this.
Done. Just so you're aware, the part of the text you posted, "men...who have had their penises removed," was not the same text at the link. It had been changed to "bottom surgery," and I changed it to emasculation.
Just curious, is the "men who have had their penises removed" supposed to say that, or is it missing a not?
I personally think SRS (or whatever the euphemism sisyphii/brutality launderers are calling it these days) should not actually be sufficient for access to publically funded single sex spaces, since religious women deserve rights too, but that's unfortunately going to be a tough sell to most of the public. Intact males, though, that's certainly a different story.
I sent this message:
Dear Supervisors and Commissioners,
We are writing to express our family's deep concern over the SF Human Rights Commission investigation into San Francisco spas offering single-sex spaces.
We are lifelong Democratic political activists and women's rights advocates. Every Democrat and liberal should be vehemently protesting the elimination of women's female-only spaces.
What is this SF HRC investigation in aid of?
Men who choose not to use men's male-only spaces?
Men with an overriding desire to appear naked among unconsenting naked little girls and women?
Men like Dwight Austin--a convicted rapist with an “above average risk” of reoffending--who demanded naked access to the female-only spaces at Archimedes Banya?
Is this what the SF Human Rights Commission stands for: forcing little girls and women to accept rapists in our female-only safe spaces?
Is this what our foremothers fought for: the complete and total loss of girls' and women's rights, over which those heroic women made such appalling sacrifices?
Is San Francisco now a city that stands on the side of violent male supremacy?
It has been many years since left-wing San Francisco teenagers learned of the dangers of transgenderism and rejected it as the assault on their human rights and bodies that it is.
When will San Francisco adults catch up with them?
Please stand with girls and women in protecting our rights to safety, privacy, and dignity in our own world.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Great letter that could be useful in any situation where people in power are imposing misogynistic practices on girls and women! Thanks for posting this.
Done. Just so you're aware, the part of the text you posted, "men...who have had their penises removed," was not the same text at the link. It had been changed to "bottom surgery," and I changed it to emasculation.
done
Just curious, is the "men who have had their penises removed" supposed to say that, or is it missing a not?
I personally think SRS (or whatever the euphemism sisyphii/brutality launderers are calling it these days) should not actually be sufficient for access to publically funded single sex spaces, since religious women deserve rights too, but that's unfortunately going to be a tough sell to most of the public. Intact males, though, that's certainly a different story.
Let's gooooo! Share far and wide!
Thank you Kara for posting about our action!