12 Comments

Holy cow, that poor girl. She could barely make it through her prepared speech without breaking down.

How DARE politicians and schools do this to our girls today?

Expand full comment

They hate women. Vote them out! American Sharia law. Women have no rights. Men have ALL the rights.

Expand full comment

Who are we voting for who supports women's rights?

Expand full comment

We? I hope you made decisions for yourself. I'm voting for whomever restores my Title IX rights that were taken away, also my freedom of speech, right to privacy and safety, parental rights. That confirms that I won't be voting Blue this round. First time in 25 years.

Expand full comment

We don't know what someone will do in the future. We can only vote in the present.

So if no one promises to restore women's rights, will you vote for no one? Because that's not going to vote anybody out.

Expand full comment

You just contradicted yourself. You said "we don't know the future" then claimed that violating women's rights will not "vote anybody out." You don't know the future. There are a lot of people who are not happy about their rights being taken away. You don't hear their voices because they're suppressed. You'll hear their voices on Nov. 4, just as the Democrats heard the voices of people of California by putting a Republican as the front runner for senate. I think we have their attention now! :) Power to the people.

Expand full comment
May 8·edited May 8

You just made up complete bullshit. I didn't say anything of the kind.

We don't know the future. I can't imagine you think you do. Especially since you seem pretty clear that *I* don't know the future.

And "not voting" is "not voting anyone out." That's just normal, ordinary logic.

In fact, the number of illogical statements in your comment are a bit staggering.

You don't know whose voices I hear.

You don't know what will happen on Nov 4 because, again, you don't know the future.

Democrats didn't "hear the voices. . .by putting a Republican as front runner for senate." You mean Democrats heard the voices. . .by *the Republicans* putting a Republican as front runner for senate.

And who exactly are the "we" and the "they" in that sentence about "attention"? Are you taking personal credit for the Republican in California? And are you squaring off against Democrats by using a 1960s Democrat slogan?

Honestly, if I were you, I wouldn't try to school someone who was mass silk-screening "power to the people" bumperstickers for San Francisco peace marches before your parents were even born.

This all just makes you look excruciatingly young and wildly ignorant.

Expand full comment

Today's FFS is a well deserved acknowledgment of a natural-born leader. Bravo to Shauna Neilan and the young women who appeared with her.

"This new law was supposed to keep women safe, however, we do not feel safe. Schools are supposed to keep all students safe, so what are those schools doing to keep us females safe? Why are transgender females more entitled than biological females? They have their rights; where are ours?" Exactly. The logical fallacy of transgender ideology allows this policy to sail through without scrutiny. If men are females, there's but one category, and the females who object are bigots.

Expand full comment

FFS Friday is such a valuable segment. Thank you, Kara, for thinking to do this. Shauna Neilan is courageous, and it is despicable it is that she needs to say anything and that girls are put through this.

Expand full comment

I wrote a short letter to WCSD. Just to try to amplify Shauna Nielan's testimony.

She should be on the national news.

Good job Shauna!!!

Expand full comment

Bravo Shauna! I cannot imagine having boys in my bathroom at school. I went into the girls bathroom room to get away from boys following me back in the day. It was my safe haven. What a shock to learn how anti women the left is. No wonder they love Hamas and terrorists that rule under Sharia law.

Expand full comment