WDI USA Statement on the 2025 Reintroduction of the “Equality Act”
The so-called "Equality Act" is racist, men's rights legislation
May 1, 2025
The post below contains yesterday’s statement of Women’s Declaration International USA (WDI USA) on the 2025 reintroduction of the “Equality Act.” The statement originally appeared on WDI USA’s website. I’m reposting it below, with permission.
It’s important to clarify that the US Equality Act is not the same as the UK Equality Act. The UK Equality Act has been the law since 2010. The US Equality Act has never been passed and is not law.
The UK Equality Act prohibits discrimination on the bases of both sex and “gender reassignment” (among other categories). The protection of “gender reassignment” is not good, in my view, and must be dealt with. However, the UK Equality Act at least maintains sex as a distinct category, and the UK Supreme Court ruled last month that it’s grounded in biology. That’s good.
A retired senior judge in the UK is challenging the UK Supreme Court’s ruling that sex is biological and yesterday, a UK feminist named Jo Bartosch wrote a scathing piece about his challenge titled, “Supreme Court challenge is trans activism’s last howl.”
In contrast to the UK Equality Act, the US Equality Act would redefine sex out of existence. As WDI USA explains, it’s racist, homophobic, and sexist. The Congressional Democrats who reintroduced it on Tuesday want you to think it’s about protecting gay rights. In fact, it’s the opposite. You can’t protect same-sex attraction in the law if you can’t define sex accurately in the law. Read on to learn more.
This post is free and shareable. A paid subscription gets you access to much more content and the ability to comment and engage in discussion with other thoughtful people.
The U.S. chapter of Women’s Declaration International (WDI USA) stands firmly in support of all women and girls as a sex class.
WDI USA has a Lesbian Caucus, which authored the Lesbian Bill of Rights and was the founding member of Lesbian Bill of Rights International (LBORI). LBORI includes the WDI USA Lesbian Caucus, LAZ reloaded (Germany), Lesbian Resistance (New Zealand), the Lesbian Action Group (Australia), Lezbicon (Norway), and Arcilesbica (Italy).
WDI USA also has a Black Women’s Caucus, which authored a Statement Against Gender Ideology, explaining why Black women must reject the lie of “gender identity” (and has issued numerous other statements and interviews with Black women who reject the pernicious lie of “gender identity”).
Finally, WDI USA also has a Desisted & Detransitioned Women’s Caucus, which authored the Desisted & Detransitioned Women’s Bill of Rights, outlining the rights, reality, and political potential of women who formerly believed themselves to have a so-called “gender identity” and have since become some of the most outspoken critics of that ideology, advocating to protect others from its harms.
The so-called “Equality Act,” reintroduced in the U.S. House and Senate on April 29, 2025, is a men’s rights bill and an attack on every woman and girl in the United States, including lesbians, because it would redefine the word “sex” to include the sexist and homophobic concept of “gender identity” throughout U.S. civil rights law. It is also an insulting appropriation of the movement for Black Liberation, which won the 1964 Civil Rights Act, outlawing racial segregation in places of public accommodation.
The Equality Act was introduced in both the House and the Senate in 2015. It would have redefined the word “sex” to include the nebulous, sexist, and homophobic concept of “gender identity” for all purposes under U.S. civil rights law. It also would have redefined the word “sex” to include sexual orientation; WDI USA unapologetically supports efforts to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. The bill has been reintroduced in every session of Congress since 2015.
In April of 2019, it went before the House Judiciary Committee for a hearing. Speaking on behalf of the group Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF), a lesbian radical feminist Democrat named Julia Beck testified against it at the invitation of a Republican House member named Debbie Lesko. At the end of her testimony, she said, “I thank the Republicans who invited me here, and I urge my fellow Democrats to WAKE UP. Please acknowledge biological reality.”
It has been six years since Julia Beck urged her “fellow Democrats to WAKE UP.” They have not.
When he was campaigning for the presidency in 2020, Joe Biden promised to get the bill enacted and signed within 100 days of taking office. He failed to do so. He failed throughout 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024. This should have been an enormous embarrassment for Biden and the Democrats in Congress.
The bill passed in the House of Representatives in 2019 and again in 2021. After the bill passed in the House in 2021, WDI USA sent a letter to then Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer, urging him not to advance it in the Senate. Thanks to WDI, the letter was signed by thousands of women all over the world. It stated:
Our understanding is that the current version of the U.S. Equality Act, which passed in the House of Representatives earlier this year, would redefine the word sex to include “gender identity” throughout U.S. Civil Rights Law. “Gender identity,” which the Equality Act defines in a circular fashion with reference to “gender-related identity, appearance, mannerisms, or other gender-related characteristics,” is, in practice, the mechanism by which individuals may claim the identity of the opposite sex. It has no basis in material reality.
Although the enactment of the Equality Act would only affect U.S. women directly, we are terrified of the impact that such enactment is likely to have globally. Our governments look to your government for leadership, expertise, and guidance. Already, we are seeing the word sex being redefined to include “gender identity” in laws throughout the U.K., the European Union, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. These laws have had devastating impacts on the lives of women and girls, including the rapes of vulnerable women in prison, the inclusion of men in women’s spaces such as locker rooms and changing rooms, and the inclusion of men in women’s sports. This situation will only get worse if this law passes in the U.S., and similar laws are likely to extend to other geographic areas as well.
The letter was sent directly to the inbox of one of Majority Leader Schumer’s top staffers, with whom we had met virtually. That staffer confirmed that she received it and that she would share it with him.
The bill then went before the Senate Judiciary Committee and WDI USA former president Kara Dansky submitted written testimony opposing it. The testimony presented three arguments:
The nation simply has not had the national conversation that we need to have about the far-reaching implications of redefining sex to include so-called “gender identity,” which the current version of the bill would do. We need to have that conversation before any legislation is enacted that would redefine sex to include so-called “gender identity.”
Simply put, men aren’t women, even if they say they are, and even if they claim to “identify” as such. Women and girls need separate spaces from male people, also known as men and boys. There is no credible scientific evidence to support the proposition that a person born with a Y chromosome can be a woman. It is appalling that these things need to be said in the 21st century.
Children are being permanently harmed at the altar of so-called “gender identity,” whether the Democrats on the Committee are willing to recognize it or not.
The Equality Act has never gone to the Senate for a full floor vote. It appeared to be dead at the end of 2022, and WDI USA issued a statement celebrating its apparent death. In that statement, we predicted that having thoroughly embarrassed themselves by failing to get it enacted during the first two years of the Biden Administration, the Democrats were not self destructive enough to introduce it again. We were wrong. They did introduce it again in 2023. It went nowhere.
Democrats in Congress have now introduced it again in 2025. On April 29, Senators Merkeley, Booker, and Baldwin introduced it in the Senate and Representative Makano introduced it in the House. The House version is here and the Senate version is here. The Associated Press covered a press conference announcing the introduction of the bill in both chambers, which was attended by very few people. One of the people who spoke at the press conference was a man named Olivia Hunt, who serves as the Director of Federal Policy for Advocates for Trans Equality. The press conference was also attended by Representative Sarah (Tim) McBride, who wore a bright pink suit.
The original 2015 bill contained the following Congressional finding:
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (referred to as “LGBT”) people commonly experience discrimination in securing access to public accommodations—including restaurants, stores, places of or establishments that provide entertainment, and transportation. Forms of discrimination include the exclusion and denial of entry, unequal or unfair treatment, harassment, and violence. This discrimination prevents the full participation of LGBT people in society and disrupts the free flow of commerce.
The 2025 version replaces “LGBT” with “LGBTQ.”
The WDI USA Lesbian Caucus has made it perfectly clear that the forced teaming of LGB (i.e., people who are same-sex attracted) with any other letters and/or symbols harms lesbians. One wonders why these Congressional Democrats could only be bothered to add the Q to the acronym, without including a + sign.
The current version of the Equality Act contains repeated references to phrases such as “LGBTQ people, as well as women,” and “LGBTQ people and women.” This is without regard to the fact that the L in the acronym is supposed to stand for lesbians, who are all women.
It is perfectly obvious to WDI USA that by “LGBTQ people and women,” these Congressional Democrats mean to protect men who claim to have “female gender identities.” They want such men to be permitted to invade all spaces intended for women (i.e., adult human female people), including all lesbian spaces. It is equally obvious to WDI USA that this men’s rights movement is trying to hijack the 1964 Civil Rights Act—a crowning achievement of the Civil Rights Movement—to allow men to access all female-only spaces. We won’t stand for it.
The Equality Act is a racist, men’s rights bill and must be opposed if the rights, privacy, and dignity of all women and girls across the nation are to be protected.
Thanks for keeping us informed on this Kara. I am sure you are aware of J.B. Pritzker’s recent visit to New Hampshire and the attention he’s getting in the mainstream press as a 2028 contender, frighteningly enough. I don’t know if you are aware of the 2Way platform. Mark Halperin is the moderator and he is joined by Sean Spicer and Dan Turentine. It is interactive with the audience based on the topics they are discussing for the day and I find the show, on most issues to be informative and politically astute. Of course they brought up JB Pritzker so I raised my hand. I talked about the Pritzker family’s financial ties to gender clinics and how their dark money funded the Obama campaign and had sway as it relates to introducing the term “gender affirming care” to the Affordable Care Act. I said how disastrous it would be for the party if he were to become the nominee since he does not respect the sex based rights of women and girls.
I specifically mentioned your name and Jennifer Bilek’s name as people who are doing important reporting/commentary. As astute as I find all of them to be politically, in my opinion none of them were as aware as they should be on this issue. I mentioned your Substack and they said they would educate themselves. I remain cautiously optimistic but won’t hold my breath.
Thank you for this. Much ink has already been spilled on the reintroduction of this misbegotten bill, so for now I will content myself to silently tear my hair out. I did, though, want to highlight and emphasize a key point you have made: “The nation simply has not had the national conversation that we need to have about the far-reaching implications of redefining sex to include so-called “gender identity,” which the current version of the bill would do. We need to have that conversation before any legislation is enacted that would redefine sex to include so-called “gender identity.”” They should have listened to you then, and they need to listen to you now.