The lies they have to tell to persuade us that it’s a legitimate civil rights movement: Part 3

August 15, 2022

This post is available to paid subscribers only. As always, thank you for your generous support, which makes it possible for me to continue in the fight to protect the sex-based rights of women and girls and to stop the abolition of sex at the altar of “gender identity.”

---

On August 3, I sent a post to paid subscribers examining all of the lies that are built into the ACLU’s “Trans Timeline.” 

I said: 

The only problem is that the entire thing consists of untruths, some a bit hidden, others more blatant. We have all known for some time that the sex-abolition industry lies about sex. It turns out that it lies about, well, pretty much everything else too. This is all just part of the industry’s efforts to persuade everyone that “trans” is a decades-long civil rights struggle. It’s historical revisionism at its finest.

As I said previously, I will not be able to pull apart all of the lies in the timeline. There are just too many of them, and there isn’t time. I’ll do my best to highlight a few of the more blatant ones, as well as point out a few entries that do bear some semblance to reality.

I did not start that piece thinking that it would be a series. However, the more I dug into the timeline, the more lies I found and I realized that the project was going to be more ambitious than I had initially thought. Part 2 was about the lies they are telling from events that occurred in the 1990s. This is Part 3, and it will start in the 2000s.