The TERF Report

The TERF Report

Share this post

The TERF Report
The TERF Report
Neese v. Becerra is one step closer to a decision from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals

Neese v. Becerra is one step closer to a decision from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals

Kara Dansky's avatar
Kara Dansky
Jan 08, 2024
∙ Paid
36

Share this post

The TERF Report
The TERF Report
Neese v. Becerra is one step closer to a decision from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals
8
2
Share

January 8, 2024

This morning, the Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit heard oral arguments in the matter of Neese v. Becerra. At issue in this case are whether: (a) recipients of federal funds under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may provide sex-specific medical care to their patients and (b) what the word sex means under Title IX of the Civil Rights Act (because the Affordable Care Act incorporates Title IX in its non-discrimination provision).

The US chapter of Women’s Declaration International filed an amicus brief in the case, where we argued:

  1. Defining sex to include “gender identity” is legally incoherent and promotes stereotype discrimination against women;

  2. The government’s policy of prohibiting sex-specific medical care harms women and girls by prioritizing “gender identity” over sex in medical care; and

  3. The government’s policy of prohibiting sex-specific medical care ultimately harms women’s sports because federal law concerning the provision of health care incorporates the definition of sex under Title IX.

From the brief: 

WDI USA is interested in this appeal because it threatens the erasure of the female sex as a legal category worthy of protection. Women and girls have endured centuries of discrimination precisely because they are members of the female sex, as defined by genetics and biology. The categories of “gender identity,” “transgender woman,” and “transgender girl” erase the female sex by replacing the objective fact of being a woman with a claimed, subjective sense of being a woman. This linguistic destabilization of the meaning of sex permits males who claim a female identity to make demands on women and girls that were previously unheard of and that undermine women’s dignity and safety. In view of its work on these issues, WDI USA has a meaningful perspective to offer the Court.

Paid only content and analysis follows. To find out what I think is interesting about this case, please consider a paid subscription.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to The TERF Report to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Kara Dansky
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share